At the same time

on Diallo's clothes and the carpet--have admitted a sexual encounter. They say it was consensual.) Of course I'll never know whether this encounter was entirely consensual. But Istrongly believe that Diallo is at least overstating Strauss-Kahn's alleged brutality, andthat there is plenty of reason to believe that this was not a violent sexual assault at all. At the same time,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the defense version of events is also rather implausible. Thenotion that Diallo would willingly perform oral sex on a complete stranger,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], in the spaceof less than eight minutes, strains credulity. I speculate that something neither violent nor completely consensual happened,such as an aggressive attempt at seduction to which she consented for fear of angeringa wealthy hotel guest. If so, Strauss-Kahn's conduct was deplorable--but was not theforcible sexual assault with which he has been charged. But the main point is that nobody except Diallo and Strauss-Kahn can knowbeyond a reasonable doubt what happened between them--let

The post has been approved 0 times